![]() “The overarching response was ‘This is serious. Shocked by the sight of New York’s makeshift morgues, Californians engaged. ![]() Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, chair of UC San Francisco’s Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics. “California deserves the credit for working collectively and with utmost caution at the start of the pandemic,” said Dr. The state’s quick and unified lockdown spared us a similar fate. But it’s tougher to sustain vigilance - especially as the closures, initially intended to be brief, have dragged on.īack in March, watching China’s catastrophe, we mobilized. Humans are wired to respond to immediate danger, like the earth rumbling beneath our homes. ![]() In case counts and burials, “we’re seeing the differences in what those decisions were,” he said.įrom the beginning, COVID-19 has been a complicated threat, invisible and abstract. Bob Wachter, chair of UC San Francisco’s Department of Medicine. “Every day, 40 million people make 20 individual decisions,” said Dr. It also sheds light on why viral spread is so highly clustered. Six months after the state’s strict stay-at-home order, this response explains our notable early success against the virus, as well as more recent failures, say experts. Duck, cover and hold on: Californians’ response to earthquakes is universal and effective.īut our reaction to a different natural disaster – the coronavirus - is profoundly personal and often divisive, revealing differences in risk perception, governance and equity as vast as the Golden State.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |